This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.


Katrina Dalao, who writes Grow to Market for food and bev founders, posted a collage yesterday that should be pinned above every CPG founder's desk.

Sixteen products. One fruit.

Jeni's banana cream. Olipop Banana Cream. Mooala banana milk. Oat Haus banana bread granola. Surreal banana cereal. Banagua banana water. Califia banana crème latte. A Cutwater Banana Mudslide. M&M's banana bread.

Her caption: "Last month I posted about what the next 'it' fruit would be. Complete miss. Looks like it's... bananas."

First, the trend is real, and it's bigger than a LinkedIn collage

Starbucks dropped Banana Protein Cold Foam and an Iced Banana Cream Protein Matcha last September. Dunkin' responded on March 4 by putting banana syrup and banana cold foam into its spring menu and anchoring more than a dozen drinks to it, including the Banana Puddin' Cloud Latte and the Banana Daydream Refresher.

Banagua, a single-ingredient banana water, raised $5.5M and hit 3,500+ retail doors in under six months. Sprouts, Kroger, Albertsons.

The banana flavor market sits around $1.34B this year and is projected at $2.06B by 2033. The NYT and Inc. have both floated it as a pumpkin spice successor.

So why banana? Because it's boring

That's the whole insight, and most operators will skip right past it.

Every other trend flavor of the last five years won on novelty. Yuzu. Ube. Pistachio. Dubai chocolate. Novelty flavors carry an education tax: you have to teach the consumer what it is before you can sell it.

Banana is the most-produced fruit on earth at 139 million metric tons a year. Zero education tax. As one commenter put it: "Bananas need no introduction." Another: "Category growth often comes from reimagining everyday ingredients rather than inventing entirely new ones."

Familiar enough to grab without thinking. Novel enough in a matcha or a seltzer to earn a post. That's the whole formula.

Now the part that will kill you if you ignore it

Katrina's sharpest line was buried in a reply: "Banana as an ingredient is beloved, but banana-flavored is so divisive."

Read that twice.

The comments split cleanly along that seam. One woman said the collage instantly reminded her of trying to trade away her banana Laffy Taffy in kindergarten. Another said she expected to hate a banana matcha boba, tried it anyway, and hasn't stopped thinking about it since.

Same fruit. Opposite reaction. The variable is isoamyl acetate, the ester that makes candy banana taste like a Runt instead of a fruit.

Products that read as real banana (Banagua, Mooala, Oat Haus, 88 Acres) get "comforting" and "clean." → Products that read as artificial banana get "medicine" and a hard pass.

Your positioning, your color palette, your ingredient panel, and your flavor house are all voting on which side you land on. Most brands never make that call deliberately, and then wonder why the LTO flopped.

The operator's takeaway

Stop hunting for the next weird fruit. The cheapest trend to ride is a familiar ingredient in an unfamiliar format, because the consumer already knows what it tastes like and you get to spend your entire ad budget on the format instead of the education.

Then pick a side of the banana line and commit. Real, or candy. There is no middle, and the middle is where products die.

Peak banana is probably 12 to 18 months out. If you're launching, launch now.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading